Home > News >

 

 

 

316Ti Stainless Steel 904L vs 316Ti Guide

Published: November 11, 2025 | Updated: November 11, 2025By Gangsteel Engineering Team – 25+ Years in Stainless Steel Export Excellence

In the competitive landscape of stainless steels compliant with ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA240/SA240M standards, comparing 904L (super-austenitic) and 316Ti (titanium-stabilized austenitic) reveals fundamental differences in corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, and suitability for severe environments.

As a premier producer and exporter based in China, Gangsteel has supplied thousands of tons of both 904L and 316Ti stainless steel, meeting ASTM A240/A240M specs for plates and sheets, to industries such as petrochemical, marine, and pharmaceutical.

If you're evaluating 904L vs 316Ti under ASME SA240/SA240M for a chemical reactor or seawater piping where pitting, acid resistance, or high-temp durability is critical, this guide provides a clear, data-driven comparison. We'll break down their attributes, including corrosion, mechanicals, and more, based on ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA240/SA240M standards and our mill data.

From our production lines, we've seen the performance difference: In a 2024 Singapore chemical plant, our 904L piping under ASTM A240 /A240M resisted concentrated sulfuric acid at 80°C with rates <0.01 mm/year, outperforming 316Ti (0.05 mm/year) by 80% in pitting tests. Compliant with ASME SA240/SA240M for pressure apps, 904L's PREN 36-43 vs 316Ti's 23-28 supports ultra-corrosive use. Let's delve into the comparison, from composition to applications, to guide your choice.

 

Summary

904L and 316Ti stainless steel under ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA240/SA240M both offer strong corrosion resistance, but 904L's higher alloying (Mo 4-5%, Ni 23-28%, Cu 1-2%) provides superior pitting and acid resistance (PREN 36-43 vs 23-28 for 316Ti), making it ideal for severe corrosives like sulfuric acid or seawater. 316Ti, with titanium stabilization, excels in high-temp IGC resistance (425-815°C) and is 30-50% cheaper ($3,200-3,800/ton vs $5,000-6,000 for 904L FOB China 2025). Strength is comparable (tensile 515 MPa for 316Ti, 490 for 904L), but 904L has better SCC durability. Density ~8.00 g/cm³ for both. Choose 904L for extreme acids, 316Ti for heat-corrosives. Gangsteel stocks both with certs for custom needs.

 

Chemical Composition: The Alloying Edge

The compositions of 904L and 316Ti, as per ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA240/SA240M, underscore 904L's superior acid resistance.

Element

316Ti %

904L %

Key Difference Impact

Carbon (C)

0.08 max

0.02 max

Lower in 904L for better resistance; 316Ti's Ti binds it.

Manganese (Mn)

2.00 max

2.00 max

Identical.

Silicon (Si)

0.75 max

1.00 max

904L higher for oxidation.

Phosphorus (P)

0.045 max

0.045 max

Identical.

Sulfur (S)

0.030 max

0.035 max

Low for both.

Chromium (Cr)

16.00-18.00

19.00-23.00

Higher in 904L for superior passivation.

Molybdenum (Mo)

2.00-3.00

4.00-5.00

904L's higher Mo boosts pitting (PREN 36-43 vs. 23-28).

Nickel (Ni)

10.00-14.00

23.00-28.00

Much higher in 904L for acid resistance.

Copper (Cu)

-

1.00-2.00

Cu in 904L enhances sulfuric acid resistance.

Titanium (Ti)

5x(C+N) min, 0.70 max

-

Ti in 316Ti prevents IGC at high temps.

Nitrogen (N)

0.10 max

0.10 max

Identical.

Iron (Fe)

Balance

Balance

Base matrix.

904L's high Mo/Ni/Cu give it an edge in acids, while 316Ti's Ti focuses on high-temp IGC.

 

Mechanical Properties: Comparable with Edges

Both grades have similar room-temp properties, but 904L's higher alloys improve durability under stress.

Property

316Ti Min

904L Min

Key Difference

Tensile Strength (MPa)

515

490

Similar; 904L retains better in acids.

Yield Strength (MPa)

205

220

904L slightly higher for load durability.

Elongation (%)

40

35

316Ti more ductile for forming.

Hardness (HRB max)

95

90

Both soft; 904L harder in work.

Impact Toughness (J)

~100 at RT

~150 at RT

904L better for impacts.

Both durable, but 904L's composition enhances SCC resistance.

 

Physical Properties: Comparable with Acid Edge for 904L

Both have similar physicals, but 904L's alloys improve acid durability.

Property

316Ti Value

904L Value

Notes

Density (g/cm³)

8.00

8.00

Identical.

Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K at 100°C)

14.6

12.9

316Ti better heat transfer.

Specific Heat (J/kg·K)

500

500

Identical.

Thermal Expansion (10^-6 /°C, 20-100°C)

16.5

15.8

904L lower for stability.

904L more resistant to thermal stress corrosion.

 

Corrosion Resistance: 904L's Dominance in Severe Conditions

904L outclasses 316Ti in most corrosives due to higher alloys.

  • Pitting/Crevice: 904L PREN 36-43 vs. 23-28; CPT ~45-55°C vs. 25°C.
  • IGC: Both resistant (316Ti Ti-stabilized, 904L low C).
  • SCC: 904L better in chlorides/acids.
  • Uniform: 904L <0.01 mm/year in strong acids; both good but 904L in harsher.
  • High-Temp: 316Ti better for IGC at 425-815°C; 904L for general acid heat.

904L more corrosion-durable overall.

 

Weldability and Fabrication: Similar Ease

Both weld well; 316Ti's Ti eliminates annealing, 904L's high alloys require care to avoid hot cracking. Machinability ~60% for both.

Gangsteel's 316Ti SA240 Type 316Ti offers simpler fab.

 

Applications: Overlapping but Specialized

  • Common: Chemical equipment (both durable).
  • 904L Specific: Pulp/paper (acid resistance).
  • 316Ti Specific: High-temp processing (IGC protection).

In Gangsteel's supply to U.S. chemical, 904L lasted longer in H2SO4.

Cost Comparison: 904L's Premium for Performance

In 2025, 904L costs 30-50% more than 316Ti ($5,000-6,000/ton vs $3,200-3,800 FOB China) due to Ni/Mo/Cu, but saves on maintenance in severe corrosives.

Equivalents: Alternatives for Both

316Ti equivalents: EN 1.4571. 904L equivalents: EN 1.4539. For A240 GR 316Ti, not interchangeable with 904L in acid-heavy apps.

Sourcing from Gangsteel: Stock and Pricing

Gangsteel stocks 316Ti and 904L at $3,200-3,800/ton (316Ti) and $5,000-6,000 (904L) FOB. 1-200mm thick, certs. Contact for comparisons.

 

FAQ: 316Ti vs 904L Performance Questions Answered

Q: How does corrosion resistance compare between 316Ti and 904L stainless steel?A: 904L has superior corrosion resistance in acidic environments like sulfuric acid due to higher Mo (4-5%) and Cu (1-2%), with PREN 36-43 vs. 23-28 for 316Ti.

Q: What are the mechanical property differences between 316Ti and 904L?A: Both have similar tensile (515 MPa for 316Ti, 490 for 904L) and elongation (40% vs. 35%), but 904L's yield is slightly higher (220 vs. 205 MPa), with better SCC performance.

Q: Is 904L better than 316Ti for marine applications?A: Yes, 904L's higher PREN (36.7 avg) offers better resistance to chloride pitting in ocean environments than 316Ti (PREN ~25), though 316Ti suffices for moderate marine use.

Q: How does high-temperature performance compare for 316Ti and 904L?A: 316Ti excels in high-temp IGC resistance (425-815°C) due to Ti, while 904L is better for general oxidation and acid heat but lacks Ti for sensitization prevention.

Q: What is the cost difference between 316Ti and 904L in 2025?A: 904L is 30-50% more expensive ($5,000-6,000/ton vs $3,200-3,800 for 316Ti FOB China) due to higher Ni/Mo/Cu, but 316Ti offers value in high-temp apps.

Q: Can I substitute 904L for 316Ti?A: Yes for upgraded acid resistance, but 904L costs more and has different properties; 316Ti for high-temp IGC focus.

Q: How does 316Ti vs 904L compare in nitric acid corrosion?A: 904L has less resistance in aggressive nitric acid than molybdenum-free grades like 304L, while 316Ti performs well in dilute nitric but not as specialized.

 

 

Other Products