Product List
Gangsteel Material Solution
Email: admin@gangsteel.com
Sales: jack@gangsteel.com
Published: November 12, 2025 | Updated: November 12, 2025By Gangsteel Engineering Team – 25+ Years in Stainless Steel Export Excellence
In the competitive landscape of stainless steels compliant with ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA-240/SA-240M standards, the difference between 316 and 316Ti lies primarily in titanium stabilization, which dramatically enhances 316Ti's performance in high-temperature and welded applications while maintaining 316's excellent corrosion resistance.
As a premier producer and exporter based in China, Gangsteel has supplied thousands of tons of both 316 and 316Ti stainless steel, meeting ASTM A240/A240M specs for plates and sheets, to industries such as petrochemical, marine, and food processing.
If you're evaluating what difference 316 316Ti under ASME SA-240/SA-240M for a heat exchanger or chemical reactor where sensitization risk, pitting resistance, or service temperature is critical, this guide provides a clear, data-driven comparison. We'll break down their differences in composition, properties, and applications, based on ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA-240/SA-240M standards and our mill data.
From our production lines, we've seen the difference in action: In a 2024 European chemical facility, our 316Ti plates under ASTM A240 /A240M resisted IGC at 600°C post-weld, while 316 showed sensitization after similar exposure, reducing life by 35% as per client A262 tests. Compliant with ASME SA240/SA240M for pressure apps, both have density 8.00 g/cm³, but 316Ti's Ti addition (0.70% max) makes the key difference. Let's explore 316 vs 316Ti, from composition to choice matrix.
The difference between 316 and 316Ti under ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA-240/SA-240M is titanium stabilization: 316Ti adds Ti (0.70% max) to bind carbon and prevent intergranular corrosion (IGC) at 425-815°C, while 316 has no Ti and risks sensitization in heat. Both share Cr 16-18%, Mo 2-3%, Ni 10-14%, tensile 515 MPa min, yield 205 MPa min, and PREN 23-28. Density 8.00 g/cm³ identical. 316Ti costs 10-15% more but offers 30% longer life in welded high-temp apps. Choose 316Ti for heat-corrosives, 316 for ambient. Gangsteel stocks both with certs.
|
Element |
316 % |
316Ti % |
Key Difference Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Carbon (C) |
0.08 max |
0.08 max |
Identical max; 316Ti's Ti binds C to prevent IGC. |
|
Manganese (Mn) |
2.00 max |
2.00 max |
Identical deoxidizer. |
|
Silicon (Si) |
0.75 max |
0.75 max |
No difference; oxidation aid. |
|
Phosphorus (P) |
0.045 max |
0.045 max |
Identical. |
|
Sulfur (S) |
0.030 max |
0.030 max |
No difference. |
|
Chromium (Cr) |
16.00-18.00 |
16.00-18.00 |
Identical passivation. |
|
Molybdenum (Mo) |
2.00-3.00 |
2.00-3.00 |
No difference; pitting aid. |
|
Nickel (Ni) |
10.00-14.00 |
10.00-14.00 |
Identical stability. |
|
Titanium (Ti) |
- |
5x(C+N) min, 0.70 max |
Ti in 316Ti prevents IGC at high temps; absent in 316. |
|
Nitrogen (N) |
0.10 max |
0.10 max |
Identical. |
|
Iron (Fe) |
Balance |
Balance |
Base matrix. |
316Ti's Ti (0.4-0.7%) forms TiC, protecting grain boundaries in heat; 316's higher free C risks Cr23C6 and IGC.
Both have comparable mechanicals per ASTM A240/A240M and ASME SA-240/SA-240M.
|
Property |
316 Min |
316Ti Min |
Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
515 |
515 |
Identical; 316Ti better retention above 500°C. |
|
Yield Strength (MPa) |
205 |
205 |
No difference at room; 316Ti higher creep. |
|
Elongation (%) |
40 |
40 |
Identical ductility. |
|
Hardness (HRB max) |
95 |
95 |
No difference. |
|
Impact Toughness (J) |
~100 at RT |
~100 at RT |
Similar. |
316Ti's Ti prevents property loss from carbides at 425-815°C.
Both share physical properties.
|
Property |
316 Value |
316Ti Value |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Density (g/cm³) |
8.00 |
8.00 |
Identical. |
|
Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K at 100°C) |
14.6 |
14.6 |
No difference. |
|
Specific Heat (J/kg·K) |
500 |
500 |
Identical. |
|
Thermal Expansion (10^-6 /°C, 20-100°C) |
16.5 |
16.5 |
Low for both. |
Similarity makes substitution easy.
Both have excellent resistance (PREN 23-28), but 316Ti's Ti prevents IGC at sensitizing temps.
316Ti more reliable for welded high-heat.
Both weld well; 316's higher C risks sensitization in heat, 316Ti's Ti eliminates it. Machinability ~60% for both.
Gangsteel's 316Ti offers heat weld edge.
In Gangsteel's supply to U.S. pharma, 316Ti excelled in heated corrosives.
In 2025, 316Ti is 10-15% more expensive than 316 ($3,200-3,800/ton vs $2,900-3,400 FOB China) due to Ti, but saves 20-30% on maintenance in heat apps.
316Ti equivalents: EN 1.4571. 316 equivalents: EN 1.4401. For A240 GR 316Ti, not interchangeable with 316 in heat.
Gangsteel stocks 316 and 316Ti at $3,200-3,800/ton FOB. 1-200mm thick, certs. Contact for comparisons.
Q: What is the main difference between 316 and 316Ti stainless steel?
A: The primary difference is titanium stabilization: 316Ti adds Ti (0.70% max) to prevent intergranular corrosion (IGC) at high temps (425-815°C), while 316 has no Ti and risks sensitization after welding or heat exposure.
Q: How does high-temperature performance differ between 316 and 316Ti?
A: 316Ti excels in high-temp IGC resistance due to Ti, retaining properties at 815°C continuous; 316 sensitizes above 425°C, leading to corrosion in grain boundaries.
Q: Is 316Ti or 316 better for welding?
A: 316Ti is better for welding in high-temp service, as Ti eliminates sensitization risk without PWHT; 316 welds well at ambient but requires care in heat zones.
Q: What is the cost difference between 316 and 316Ti?
A: 316Ti costs 10-15% more than 316 due to titanium, but offers better value in high-temp apps with 30% longer life.
Q: How do pitting and crevice corrosion compare for 316 and 316Ti?
A: Identical with Mo for pitting resistance (PREN 23-28); no significant difference in chlorides like seawater.
Q: Can I substitute 316 for 316Ti?
A: Yes for ambient conditions, but not for high-temp or welded apps where 316Ti's Ti prevents IGC; check service temp.
Q: What is the PREN of 316 vs 316Ti?
A: Both PREN 23-28; identical pitting resistance, but 316Ti's Ti adds no direct PREN benefit—Mo is the key.
ASTM A516 GR 70 equivalent materials is such as ASME SA516 GR 70, EN 10028 P355GH, and BS1501 224-490 A & B, sh
we supply high-quality A516 Gr 70 steel plate for pressure vessel applications and other standards like ASTM A2
EN10028-2 P355GH for High-Strength Low-Alloy Columbium-Vanadium Structural Steel EN10025-2 S355J2 Structural St
We export A240 304L Stainless Coil 2B, NO.1 No.4 surface, the thickness 0.1mm to 3mm, 3mm to 22mm, Mother mill