Home > News >

 

 

201 vs 430 Stainless Steel: A Comprehensive Comparison

Gangsteel, a trusted Chinese exporter specializing in premium cold-rolled stainless steel coils and sheets, provides expert analysis on comparing grades like 201 and 430.

These two stainless steels represent different families: 201 is an austenitic grade with manganese substitution for nickel, offering a budget-friendly alternative to 304, while 430 is a ferritic grade known for its magnetic properties and cost-effectiveness in mild environments. Understanding their differences is essential for applications in appliances, automotive, construction, and food processing. This article examines chemical composition, mechanical properties, equivalent materials, corrosion resistance, weldability, applications, and more. As specialists in ferritic steels, Gangsteel stocks high-quality options like our JIS G4305 SUS 430 stainless steel sheet, which exemplifies 430's versatility.

Austenitic 201 (AISI 201 or UNS S20100) was developed to conserve nickel, using manganese and nitrogen for stabilization, resulting in good formability and corrosion resistance. Ferritic 430 (AISI 430 or UNS S43000), a straight-chromium alloy, prioritizes thermal conductivity and oxidation resistance but lacks nickel entirely. While both contain 16-18% chromium for basic passivation, their microstructures—face-centered cubic (FCC) for 201 (non-magnetic) versus body-centered cubic (BCC) for 430 (magnetic)—lead to distinct behaviors. Gangsteel's exports, including the a240 Type_430 stainless steel sheet, cater to global standards for reliable performance.

 

Chemical Composition Comparison

The alloying elements define each grade's core characteristics, with 201 emphasizing austenite stabilizers and 430 focusing on simplicity.

Composition Table

Below is a side-by-side comparison based on ASTM A240 specifications:

Element

201 (wt%)

430 (wt%)

Carbon (C)

≤0.15

≤0.12

Chromium (Cr)

16.0-18.0

16.0-18.0

Manganese (Mn)

5.5-7.5

≤1.0

Nickel (Ni)

3.5-5.5

≤0.75 (often minimal)

Silicon (Si)

≤1.0

≤1.0

Nitrogen (N)

≤0.25

-

Phosphorus (P)

≤0.060

≤0.040

Sulfur (S)

≤0.030

≤0.030

Iron (Fe)

Balance

Balance

201's higher manganese and nitrogen compensate for lower nickel, maintaining austenitic structure and enhancing strength. 430's minimal additions keep costs low but limit ductility. For European-compliant ferritics, our EN10088 2 X6Cr17 stainless steel sheet matches 430's profile.

 

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Mechanical traits influence formability, strength, and service life, with 201 showing work-hardening potential and 430 offering moderate values.

Properties Table (Annealed Condition)

Data from ASTM A240 and typical values:

Property

201

430

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

≥310 MPa (45 ksi)

≥205 MPa (30 ksi)

Tensile Strength

≥655 MPa (95 ksi)

≥450 MPa (65 ksi)

Elongation (in 50 mm)

≥40%

≥22%

Hardness (Rockwell B)

≤100 HRB

≤89 HRB

Modulus of Elasticity

200 GPa

200 GPa

Density

7.80 g/cm³

7.70 g/cm³

201 exhibits higher strength due to nitrogen and manganese, with excellent ductility for deep drawing. It work-hardens rapidly, achieving up to 1200 MPa tensile in cold-worked states. 430, softer and less ductile, suits stamping but risks brittleness at low temperatures. Gangsteel's DIN 1.4016 stainless steel sheet delivers consistent 430 properties.

 

Equivalent Materials

Both grades have international counterparts for global sourcing.

Equivalents Table

Standard/Region

201 Equivalent

430 Equivalent

AISI/UNS (USA)

201 / S20100

430 / S43000

EN/DIN (Europe)

1.4372 / X12CrMnNiN17-7-5

1.4016 / X6Cr17

JIS (Japan)

SUS201

SUS430

GB (China)

1Cr17Mn6Ni5N / 12Cr17Mn6Ni5N

1Cr17 / 10Cr17

BS (UK)

-

430S17

AFNOR (France)

-

Z8C17

ISO

-

X6Cr17

GOST (Russia)

12Х17Г9АН4

12X17

201's equivalents emphasize manganese-austenitics, while 430's are straight-chromium ferritics. Our GB/T 10Cr17 1Cr17 stainless steel sheet provides a Chinese-standard 430 option.

 

Corrosion and Oxidation Resistance

Corrosion behavior varies by microstructure and environment.

201 offers good general corrosion resistance in mild acids, alkalis, and atmospheres, similar to 304 but with risks of pitting in chlorides due to lower nickel. Its nitrogen boosts resistance to localized attack. 430 provides adequate protection in dry, oxidizing conditions but is prone to rust in humid or chloride-exposed areas, lacking nickel's stabilization.

For oxidation: 201 scales at 900°C, suitable for moderate heat; 430 resists up to 815°C intermittent, better for dry heat but susceptible to embrittlement. In food/contact applications, both meet standards, but 201's austenitic nature handles acids better. Choose 201 for wet environments, 430 for dry/oxidizing ones like our JIS G4305 SUS 430 stainless steel sheet.

 

Weldability and Fabrication

Fabrication differs significantly.

201 welds well with TIG/MIG, non-magnetic and ductile, but may need fillers like 308L to prevent hot cracking. It work-hardens, requiring annealing for multi-pass welds. 430 welds adequately but sensitizes in HAZ, risking intergranular corrosion; preheating and annealing mitigate this, though it's magnetic and less formable.

Both machine similarly, with 201's austenite allowing better polishing. 430's ferritic structure suits magnetic handling. For complex forms, 201 excels; for simple stamping, 430 suffices, as in Gangsteel's a240 Type_430 stainless steel sheet.

 

Applications: Where Each Shines

Uses for 201

  • Appliances: Utensils, sinks (formable, corrosion-resistant)
  • Automotive: Trim, structural parts (strength, low cost)
  • Construction: Railings, hardware (aesthetics, durability)
  • Food: Cookware, processing (acid resistance)
  • Transportation: Rail cars (work-hardening)

201 suits cost-driven, form-intensive uses.

Uses for 430

  • Appliances: Refrigerator panels, dishwashers (magnetic, thermal)
  • Automotive: Exhaust trim, wheel covers (oxidation resistance)
  • Architecture: Cladding, elevators (polishable, economical)
  • Industrial: Heat exchangers, furnace parts (high temp)
  • Decorative: Signage, fixtures (BA finish)

430 thrives in mild, heat-exposed settings, like our EN10088 2 X6Cr17 stainless steel sheet.

 

Cost and Availability

201 costs less than 304 (1200-1500 USD/MT) due to manganese substitution, widely available. 430 is even cheaper (1100-1400 USD/MT) as nickel-free, abundant in ferritic markets. Gangsteel's Chinese sourcing ensures competitive pricing for 430 variants like DIN 1.4016 stainless steel sheet.

Trends: 201 gains in volatile nickel markets; 430 steady for magnetic needs.

 

Choosing Between 201 and 430

Opt for 201 in corrosive, formable applications; 430 for thermal, magnetic, or budget-dry uses. Test for specifics.

FAQ

What is the key structural difference?

201 is austenitic (non-magnetic, ductile); 430 ferritic (magnetic, thermal).

Which has better corrosion resistance?

201 in wet/acidic; 430 in dry/oxidizing.

Can both be welded?

Yes, but 201 easier without sensitization.

Best for appliances?

201 for strength; 430 for panels, as in GB/T 10Cr17 1Cr17 stainless steel sheet.

Does Gangsteel offer both?

We excel in 430 equivalents; inquire for 201.

In summary, 201 offers versatility, 430 economy—Gangsteel aids your choice.

 

Other Products