Home > News >

 

 

302 vs 430 Stainless Steel: A Comprehensive Comparison

Gangsteel, a prominent Chinese exporter specializing in high-quality cold-rolled stainless steel coils and sheets, provides an in-depth analysis of 302 versus 430 stainless steel.

Grade 302, an austenitic stainless steel from the 300 series (AISI 302 or UNS S30200), is valued for its high strength, excellent corrosion resistance, and non-magnetic properties, often used as a higher-carbon variant of 304 for applications requiring enhanced tensile strength. In contrast, 430 (AISI 430 or UNS S43000) is a ferritic stainless steel known for its affordability, magnetic characteristics, and suitability in mildly corrosive environments with good thermal performance. This comparison highlights their differences in composition, properties, and uses, aiding selection for industries like aerospace, automotive, appliances, and construction. As ferritic steel experts, Gangsteel offers premium products like our JIS G4305 SUS 430 stainless steel sheet, which exemplifies 430's reliability.

The austenitic structure of 302—face-centered cubic (FCC)—derives from chromium and nickel, providing superior ductility and resistance to harsh conditions, while 430's ferritic body-centered cubic (BCC) matrix relies on chromium alone, prioritizing economy and heat conductivity. Both grades share 16-19% chromium for passivation, but 302's nickel (8-10%) and higher carbon (up to 0.15%) boost strength and work-hardening. Gangsteel's exports, including the a240 Type_430 stainless steel sheet, meet ASTM standards for versatile global applications.

 

Chemical Composition Comparison

The alloying elements shape each grade's performance, with 302 incorporating more carbon for strength and nickel for austenite stability, unlike 430's minimalistic approach.

Composition Table

Based on ASTM A240 specifications:

Element

302 (wt%)

430 (wt%)

Carbon (C)

≤0.15

≤0.12

Chromium (Cr)

17.0-19.0

16.0-18.0

Manganese (Mn)

≤2.0

≤1.0

Nickel (Ni)

8.0-10.0

≤0.75 (often minimal)

Silicon (Si)

≤1.0

≤1.0

Phosphorus (P)

≤0.045

≤0.040

Sulfur (S)

≤0.030

≤0.030

Iron (Fe)

Balance

Balance

302's elevated carbon enhances hardness after cold working, while nickel improves corrosion resistance. 430's lower alloying keeps production costs down but limits ductility. For European standards, our EN10088 2 X6Cr17 stainless steel sheet reflects 430's composition under EN norms.

 

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Mechanical characteristics influence fabrication and load-bearing, with 302 offering superior strength from its austenitic nature and higher carbon.

Properties Table (Annealed Condition)

From ASTM A240 and typical values:

Property

302

430

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

≥205 MPa (30 ksi)

≥205 MPa (30 ksi)

Tensile Strength

≥515 MPa (75 ksi)

≥450 MPa (65 ksi)

Elongation (in 50 mm)

≥40%

≥22%

Hardness (Rockwell B)

≤92 HRB

≤89 HRB

Modulus of Elasticity

193 GPa

200 GPa

Density

8.00 g/cm³

7.70 g/cm³

302 achieves higher tensile strength (up to 860 MPa when cold-worked) due to work-hardening, with excellent ductility for forming. 430 provides moderate strength but lower elongation, making it prone to cracking in severe bends. Its ferritic structure ensures better thermal stability. Gangsteel's DIN 1.4016 stainless steel sheet delivers reliable mechanical properties for 430-based projects.

 

Equivalent Materials

Both grades have international analogs for seamless substitution.

Equivalents Table

Standard/Region

302 Equivalent

430 Equivalent

AISI/UNS (USA)

302 / S30200

430 / S43000

EN/DIN (Europe)

1.4310 / X10CrNi18-8

1.4016 / X6Cr17

JIS (Japan)

SUS302

SUS430

GB (China)

1Cr18Ni9 / 12Cr18Ni9

1Cr17 / 10Cr17

BS (UK)

302S25

430S17

AFNOR (France)

Z10CN18-09

Z8C17

ISO

X10CrNi18-8

X6Cr17

GOST (Russia)

12Х18Н9

12X17

302's equivalents focus on high-carbon austenitics, while 430's are basic ferritics. Our GB/T 10Cr17 1Cr17 stainless steel sheet serves as a Chinese equivalent for 430.

 

Corrosion and Oxidation Resistance

Corrosion traits differ markedly due to microstructures.

302 provides strong resistance to atmospheric, chemical, and mild acid corrosion, with good pitting resistance in chlorides (PREN ~19). Its nickel content prevents stress corrosion cracking, making it suitable for food and marine uses. However, higher carbon can lead to sensitization if not low-carbon variant (302L).

430 offers adequate protection in dry atmospheres and fresh water but is vulnerable to pitting in chlorides or acids, lacking nickel's enhancement. It's better for oxidation, resisting scaling up to 815°C intermittent versus 302's 870°C, but embrittles over time.

Opt for 302 in corrosive or wet environments; 430 in dry, oxidizing ones, as with our JIS G4305 SUS 430 stainless steel sheet.

 

Weldability and Fabrication

Fabrication profiles vary by alloy type.

302 welds excellently via TIG/MIG, remaining non-magnetic and ductile; use low-carbon fillers (308L) to avoid carbide precipitation, especially with its higher carbon. It forms complex shapes easily and polishes well, though work-hardens rapidly, requiring annealing for multi-stage processes.

430 welds adequately but sensitizes in the heat-affected zone, necessitating post-weld annealing for corrosion restoration; preheating (150-200°C) prevents cracking. Less formable than 302, it's magnetic for easy handling but risks brittleness in cold work.

For demanding fabrication, 302; for simple, 430 like our a240 Type_430 stainless steel sheet.

 

Applications: Where Each Shines

Uses for 302

  • Springs and fasteners: High strength from cold working
  • Aerospace: Components requiring toughness
  • Medical: Surgical instruments (non-magnetic)
  • Food processing: Equipment in acidic environments
  • Automotive: Stampings, wire forms

302 suits high-stress, formable parts.

Uses for 430

  • Appliances: Panels, trim (thermal, magnetic)
  • Automotive: Exhaust trim, decorative parts (oxidation)
  • Architecture: Cladding in mild areas (economy)
  • Industrial: Heat exchangers (conductivity)
  • Kitchenware: Sinks, utensils (polishable)

430 excels in cost-driven, mild uses, as in EN10088 2 X6Cr17 stainless steel sheet.

 

Cost and Availability

302 costs more (1600-2000 USD/MT) due to nickel and carbon control, available but pricier than 304. 430 is economical (1200-1400 USD/MT), widely supplied as nickel-free. Gangsteel's Chinese manufacturing ensures competitive pricing for 430 options like DIN 1.4016 stainless steel sheet.

Trends: 302 for specialized strength; 430 for volume economy.

 

Choosing Between 302 and 430

Choose 302 for strength, corrosion, and formability in demanding settings; 430 for cost, thermal, and magnetic needs in mild conditions. Assess environment, load, and budget.

 

FAQ

What differentiates 302 from 430 structurally?

302 austenitic (non-magnetic, ductile); 430 ferritic (magnetic, thermal).

Which offers better corrosion resistance?

302 in chlorides/acids; 430 in dry oxidation.

Weldability edge?

302, less sensitization risk despite higher carbon.

Ideal for springs?

302, high work-hardening.

Gangsteel offerings?

Specialize in 430 equivalents like GB/T 10Cr17 1Cr17 stainless steel sheet; inquire for 302.

In summary, 302 delivers premium strength, 430 value—Gangsteel assists your selection.

 

Other Products